It's axiomatic that if you elect dumb legislators you'll get dumb legislation, and considering the results of the last election, this is only the beginning. The only great thing about this is that it's not Lincolnland. Out west in big sky country, Joe Read, a Montana legislator, has proposed a "global warming" bill that cranks up the dumb.
Section 1. Public policy concerning global warming. (1) The legislature finds that to ensure economic development in Montana and the appropriate management of Montana’s natural resources it is necessary to adopt a public policy regarding global warming.
(2) The legislature finds:
(a) global warming is beneficial to the welfare and business climate of Montana;
(b) reasonable amounts of carbon dioxide released into the atmosphere have no verifiable impacts on the environment; and
(c) global warming is a natural occurrence and human activity has not accelerated it.
(3) (a) For the purposes of this section, “global warming” relates to an increase in the average temperature of the earth’s surface.
(b) It does not include a one-time, catastrophic release of carbon dioxide.
This seems to say: 1. global warming isn't happening, 2. if it is happening, then it's not our fault, 3. global warming is a good thing anyways, so why worry?, and 4. if global warming turns out to be a catastrophe, we couldn't have done anything about it anyways. It only left out a sneering na na nana. Here you have a legislator who wants a state to legally deny science probably to prempt any federal attempt to regulate carbon dioxide emissions. As Steve Allen would say, Dumbth, and to the nth degree. Good luck Montana.
Field of Science
-
-
-
Antibiotics & Agriculture Part 4: The Transfer of Antibiotic Resistance22 hours ago in Memoirs of a Defective Brain
-
Keeping up to date22 hours ago in Games with Words
-
-
-
Supreme Court bungles the science in DNA patent decision3 days ago in Genomics, Evolution, and Pseudoscience
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Thanksgiving2 weeks ago in The Curious Wavefunction
-
-
Bioengineers go retro to build a calculator from living cells4 weeks ago in The Allotrope
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
The Lure of the Obscure? Guest Post by Frank Stahl1 year ago in Sex, Genes & Evolution
-
-
Finding a new translation factor, and verifying it with help from my experimental friends1 year ago in Protein Evolution and Other Musings
-
Free ImageJ Macro -- for citing images1 year ago in Skeptic Wonder
-
-
-
The Large Picture Blog Has Moved1 year ago in The Large Picture Blog
-
Lab Rat Moving House1 year ago in Life of a Lab Rat
-
Goodbye FoS, thanks for all the laughs1 year ago in Disease Prone
-
Branson getting into microbial diversity in the deep sea2 years ago in The Greenhouse
A plant pundit comments on plants, the foibles and fun of academic life, and other things of interest.
3 comments:
Stupid, yes. Immediately dangerous, not so clear. At least there doesn't seem to be anything to prevent teachers from discussing it otherwise (although I didn't bother to see just what Chap. 75 as a whole does). The real danger is in encouraging the attitude that science and reality can be anything you want it to be. Thank goodness Montana doesn't buy many schoolbooks, like the legislature of some other very large state to the south which will remain nameless and is stupider in more ways and more aggressive about it.
Open Mind has also commented on this: http://tamino.wordpress.com/2011/02/19/the-champion/
Thanks for the link. PP will have a look.
Post a Comment