Lincolnland is trying to decide if gay marriage will be
legal, and from TPP’s perspective, how can it not be, particularly because
civil unions for gay couples have been approved already? So what’s the controversy? There really isn’t any because the proposed
law does not compel any religion to perform a marriage for any couple they
disapprove of. TPP was quite fortunate to
have gotten married long, long ago, in a place far, far away, because presently the
Catholic Church surely would not allow him to marry one of theirs, if she still
was one of theirs.
Conversely, our church has no problem with the idea of gay marriage, but
our church is prevented from exercising its freedom of religion by another
religion whose practices have become codified into law. Our local dolt representative is a member of
the GnOPe, so he has a non-reasoning, knee-jerk response which seems to simply
be, no, he won’t vote for it. Well, here’s
a message for our representative. In
case you didn’t know, religion does not own marriage here in Lincolnland,
although a religious organization has claimed [Marriage] “is not a civil right;
marriage was created by God and cannot be modified by anybody except God.” Well, folks, you may believe that, but it
isn’t in fact true and that train pulled out of the station a long, long time
ago because any heterosexual couple, even if atheists, can go right down to the courthouse, sign a
piece of paper, and without a single religious blessing or reference, be
married. And so can gay couples except it's a civil union. So the only question
remaining, and this may not have occurred to our representative’s little GnOPe
brain is why aren’t all committed couples equal before the law? Why does the change in wording of civil union to marriage make this a no-no? Is it because of your religious beliefs tell
you it’s wrong if they are gay? If so,
why should your “freedom” of religion be allowed to prevent the freedom of
another religion? Is it because your religion is, nudge, nudge,
wink, wink, the one true religion? So
why do I care what you believe except you get to decide for everyone, a mistake
that will have to be corrected by our democratic process. Perhaps you haven’t read the US constitution
lately; a refresher course is suggested.
Field of Science
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
The Even Earlier Discovery of Antibiotic Resistance1 day ago in Memoirs of a Defective Brain
-
Religion is halfway between a fact and an opinion - according to kids and adults3 days ago in Epiphenom
-
Bioengineers go retro to build a calculator from living cells3 days ago in The Allotrope
-
-
A New Non-mammaliaform Eucynodont from the Ischigualasto Formation of Argentina1 week ago in Chinleana
-
-
Chemistry, fluid dynamics and an awful radioactive mess1 week ago in The Curious Wavefunction
-
Exploding expertise2 weeks ago in The Culture of Chemistry
-
-
-
-
-
UPDATED: 10 things we need to find out about the #NCoV1 month ago in Rule of 6ix
-
-
-
-
-
The Lure of the Obscure? Guest Post by Frank Stahl11 months ago in Sex, Genes & Evolution
-
-
Finding a new translation factor, and verifying it with help from my experimental friends1 year ago in Protein Evolution and Other Musings
-
Free ImageJ Macro -- for citing images1 year ago in Skeptic Wonder
-
-
-
The Large Picture Blog Has Moved1 year ago in The Large Picture Blog
-
Lab Rat Moving House1 year ago in Life of a Lab Rat
-
Goodbye FoS, thanks for all the laughs1 year ago in Disease Prone
-
Branson getting into microbial diversity in the deep sea2 years ago in The Greenhouse
A plant pundit comments on plants, the foibles and fun of academic life, and other things of interest.
2 comments:
Amen!!
I often lurk here in Phyto Land, enjoying your witticisms about all things green, etc. etc.
Thanks.
Guess Mrs. Phactor told you about the response the ol' F1 got from the well reasoned plea in favor of marriage equality she sent off to her state representative. The request for said representative to quantify his "no" answer has not been met. Considering the option of seeing just how many of his constituents I can get to write him to say they too think marriage equality should be law in our state and see if numbers would get him to change his mind. If that doesn't work, maybe the F1 will think about forming an exploratory committee to give this man an actual competitor for his next re-election. Getting tired of receiving the same answer to every question from "my" elected officials.
Post a Comment