- Home
- Angry by Choice
- Catalogue of Organisms
- Chinleana
- Doc Madhattan
- Games with Words
- Genomics, Medicine, and Pseudoscience
- History of Geology
- Moss Plants and More
- Pleiotropy
- Plektix
- RRResearch
- Skeptic Wonder
- The Culture of Chemistry
- The Curious Wavefunction
- The Phytophactor
- The View from a Microbiologist
- Variety of Life
Field of Science
-
-
From Valley Forge to the Lab: Parallels between Washington's Maneuvers and Drug Development4 weeks ago in The Curious Wavefunction
-
Political pollsters are pretending they know what's happening. They don't.4 weeks ago in Genomics, Medicine, and Pseudoscience
-
-
Course Corrections5 months ago in Angry by Choice
-
-
The Site is Dead, Long Live the Site2 years ago in Catalogue of Organisms
-
The Site is Dead, Long Live the Site2 years ago in Variety of Life
-
Does mathematics carry human biases?4 years ago in PLEKTIX
-
-
-
-
A New Placodont from the Late Triassic of China5 years ago in Chinleana
-
Posted: July 22, 2018 at 03:03PM6 years ago in Field Notes
-
Bryophyte Herbarium Survey7 years ago in Moss Plants and More
-
Harnessing innate immunity to cure HIV8 years ago in Rule of 6ix
-
WE MOVED!8 years ago in Games with Words
-
-
-
-
post doc job opportunity on ribosome biochemistry!9 years ago in Protein Evolution and Other Musings
-
Growing the kidney: re-blogged from Science Bitez9 years ago in The View from a Microbiologist
-
Blogging Microbes- Communicating Microbiology to Netizens10 years ago in Memoirs of a Defective Brain
-
-
-
The Lure of the Obscure? Guest Post by Frank Stahl12 years ago in Sex, Genes & Evolution
-
-
Lab Rat Moving House13 years ago in Life of a Lab Rat
-
Goodbye FoS, thanks for all the laughs13 years ago in Disease Prone
-
-
Slideshow of NASA's Stardust-NExT Mission Comet Tempel 1 Flyby13 years ago in The Large Picture Blog
-
in The Biology Files
A plant pundit comments on plants, the foibles and fun of academic life, and other things of interest.
Non-green gardening - giving up peat
Peat is the partially decomposed remains of plants from peat bogs, primarily the Sphagnum, i.e., peat moss. As such peat bogs are long-term repositories of carbon. When that peat is "mined" and removed from its low oxygen, low pH, water-logged environment, and spread around our gardens in the form of a soil additive or a potting mix or a starter pot, it finishes its decomposition rather quickly releasing all that stored carbon as carbon dioxide. It's hard to think about giving up a common gardening practice because it's akin to coal mining and "dirty" coal, but it actually is, so we should. And because peat bogs are drained so that the peat can be mined, a valuable wetland is destroyed, and the rather unique organisms that inhabit bogs have the habitat destroyed in the process. Bogs like this formed very slowly, and they can regenerate, but they do so at a terribly slow rate, so peat use is like deforestation, a non-sustainable practice. In this respect, TPP is as guilty as anyone. In come places alternatives to peat, other bio-materials that would regularly decompose quickly anyways, are being sought, but so far TPP has seen no significant move in that direction in these parts. The use of used newsprint and coconut fiber to make "peaty" pots is being to show up in the trade. Fortunately the local municipality mulches and composts yard, garden, and wood waste which can be used to augment soil instead. It's hard to get numbers on how big of a carbon footprint the use of peat generates; global warming is speeding up the decomposition of peat in nature as well. Peat is more common in higher latitudes where the cold keeps things locked up for longer periods of time. The peat problem is a particularly ironic one because gardeners in general like to think of themselves as the good guys, advancing the front of "green" living, and then it turns out our carbon footprint is bigger than anyone thought. Besides peat is too valuable for other uses such as making that smoky malt used for whisky production. The image above is the property of Kristian Peters, used under the terms of the Wikimedia Creative Commons.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
Not directly on the topic of peat use by gardeners, but this paper from 2001 has some interesting thoughts and numbers on peat:
"How sustainable is the use of peat for commercial energy
production?" by Anne Jelle Schilstra
It is available here:
http://ivem.eldoc.ub.rug.nl/FILES/ivempubs/publart/2001/EcolEconSchilstra/2001EcolEconSchilstra.pdf
Sorry about the long..long URL !
I´m trying to give up the brown stuff myself.
thanks for some great posts
BrianO
Thanks for the terrific reference; peat for energy is most certainly unsustainable. Growth is so slow.
More short-rotation coppice seems like the logical way to go for bio-energy that's closer to carbon-neutral... and most of the studies I've seen show a lot of biodiversity gains for bugs and birds, the roots are not disturbed so there are soil erosion (and soil carbon) gains, plus most of the fast-growing, weedy tree species best suited to this also do well on poor land, so reduce the manufactured chemical input needed for more conventional crops. Let's see every floodplain full of osiers again! That might even help with flood management...
Also, even if a bog regrows, the palaeoecological records it contained are gone forever - bogs need friends (lots of coir-based peat-substitutes available in bags from the garden-centre alongside the regular peat here, thankfully).
Post a Comment