Things have really changed. There was no stigma to attending a state college. And certainly no one was in the business of bribing admissions people, although some wealthy legacies existed, but they were the exception not the rule, and mostly they went to a particular college it was because it was where a parent or older sibling attended. It didn't seem likely that this connection was going to be influential later in life. It does explain perhaps why some of the people you meet professionally who graduated from a prestige school don't seem all that exceptional. The people who do the admissions bribery are the type of people who are impressed by the perceived prestige of certain institutions. Out here in the great Midwest, our huge state universities sort of blunt the prestige of smallish private school, so big damn deal. TPP has a talented niece whose writing was impressive enough to get admission to Oxford, clearly meritorious. TPP's undergraduate record was so unimpressive that a department chair actually began to question, what such a record told you about potential success in graduate school. It only meant that TPP had changed, grew up, transitioned, whatever, to academic life. Of course TPP was not in Business school, but in botany, and you only decide on something like botany because you love it. Do MBAs love their subject, or is it just a ticket to make more money?
1 comment:
very nice article. helpful information. for more details contact @delveinsight
www.delveinsight.com
Post a Comment