A distant correspondent and long-time friend has provided TPP with this letter written by a biological colleague at Boise State.  
The Opinion 
Pages
Op-Ed 
Contributor
When May I Shoot 
a Student?
By GREG 
HAMPIKIAN
FEB. 27, 2014 
BOISE, Idaho — 
TO the chief counsel of the Idaho State Legislature:
In light of the 
bill permitting guns on our state’s college and university campuses, which is 
likely to be approved by the state House of Representatives in the coming days, 
I have a matter of practical concern that I hope you can help with: When may I 
shoot a student?
I am a biology 
professor, not a lawyer, and I had never considered bringing a gun to work until 
now. But since many of my students are likely to be armed, I thought it would be 
a good idea to even the playing field. 
I have had 
encounters with disgruntled students over the years, some of whom seemed quite 
upset, but I always assumed that when they reached into their backpacks they 
were going for a pencil. Since I carry a pen to lecture, I did not feel 
outgunned; and because there are no working sharpeners in the lecture hall, the 
most they could get off is a single point. But now that we’ll all be packing 
heat, I would like legal instruction in the rules of classroom engagement. 
At present, the 
harshest penalty available here at Boise State is expulsion, used only for the 
most heinous crimes, like cheating on Scantron exams. But now that lethal force 
is an option, I need to know which infractions may be treated as de facto 
capital crimes.
I assume that if 
a student shoots first, I am allowed to empty my clip; but given the velocity of 
firearms, and my aging reflexes, I’d like to be proactive. For example, if I am 
working out a long equation on the board and several students try to correct me 
using their laser sights, am I allowed to fire a warning shot? 
If two armed 
students are arguing over who should be served next at the coffee bar and I 
sense escalating hostility, should I aim for the legs and remind them of the 
campus Shared-Values Statement (which reads, in part, “Boise State strives to 
provide a culture of civility and success where all feel safe and free from 
discrimination, harassment, threats or intimidation”)? 
While our city 
police chief has expressed grave concerns about allowing guns on campus, I would 
point out that he already has one. I’m glad that you were not intimidated by 
him, and did not allow him to speak at the public hearing on the bill (though I 
really enjoyed the 40 minutes you gave to the National Rifle Association 
spokesman). 
Knee-jerk 
reactions from law enforcement officials and university presidents are best set 
aside. Ignore, for example, the lame argument that some drunken frat boys will 
fire their weapons in violation of best practices. This view is based on 
stereotypical depictions of drunken frat boys, a group whose dignity no one 
seems willing to defend. 
The problem, of 
course, is not that drunken frat boys will be armed; it is that they are drunken 
frat boys. Arming them is clearly not the issue. They would cause damage with or 
without guns. I would point out that urinating against a building or firing a 
few rounds into a sorority house are both violations of the same honor code. 
In terms of the 
campus murder rate — zero at present — I think that we can all agree that guns 
don’t kill people, people with guns do. Which is why encouraging guns on campus 
makes so much sense. Bad guys go where there are no guns, so by adding guns to 
campus more bad guys will spend their year abroad in London. Britain has 
incredibly restrictive laws — their cops don’t even have guns! — and gun deaths 
there are a tiny fraction of what they are in America. It’s a perfect place for 
bad guys. 
Some of my 
colleagues are concerned that you are encouraging firearms within a densely 
packed concentration of young people who are away from home for the first time, 
and are coincidentally the age associated with alcohol and drug experimentation, 
and the commission of felonies. 
Once again, this 
reflects outdated thinking about students. My current students have grown up 
learning responsible weapon use through virtual training available on the Xbox 
and PlayStation. Far from being enamored of violence, many studies have shown, 
they are numb to it. These creative young minds will certainly be stimulated by 
access to more technology at the university, items like autoloaders, silencers 
and hollow points. I am sure that it has not escaped your attention that the 
library would make an excellent shooting range, and the bookstore could do with 
fewer books and more ammo choices.
I want to 
applaud the Legislature’s courage. On a final note: I hope its members will 
consider my amendment for bulletproof office windows and faculty body armor in 
Boise State blue and orange.
Greg Hampikian is a professor of biology and criminal justice 
at Boise State University and a co-author of “Exit to Freedom.”