tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7565734316555677541.post7592091788436783458..comments2023-09-20T11:00:37.211-05:00Comments on The Phytophactor: Osmundastrum? Oh, no, phylogenetic taxonomy has done it to me again!The Phytophactorhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11064894836161407416noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7565734316555677541.post-20675539237120609202014-06-24T16:56:13.387-05:002014-06-24T16:56:13.387-05:00Are you implying something about my age?Are you implying something about my age?The Phytophactorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11064894836161407416noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7565734316555677541.post-1683640405632038072014-06-23T23:06:18.602-05:002014-06-23T23:06:18.602-05:00I could point out, of course, that the name Osmund...I could point out, of course, that the name <i>Osmundastrum</i> dates back to 1847, so it's hardly a 'new' name.Christopher Taylorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11075565866351612441noreply@blogger.com